|
|
|
|
|
General understanding |
Shows a thorough and thoughtful understanding of the material. |
Shows a good understanding of the material |
Shows a basic understanding of the material |
Shows little understanding of the material |
Math point |
Fully and eloquently articulates mathematical concepts. Develops connections among mathematical concepts. |
Clearly articulates mathematical concepts |
Explains mathematical concepts without difficulty, but expresses ideas in rudimentary form. |
Displays errors in knowledge of mathematical concepts |
Examples |
Well chosen, relevant and clear examples |
Appropriate examples. |
Adequate examples with minor flaws |
No examples or flawed examples. |
Presentation skills |
The presenter speaks clearly and loudly enough to be heard, using, engages the audience. |
Clear voice, generally effective delivery; minimal distracting gestures, etc., but occasionally monotone; |
Voice ccasionally inaudible; some distracting filler words articulation mostly, but not always, clear; |
The presenter cannot be heard or speaks so unclearly that the words cannot be interpreted. Mumbles the words, too many filler words; |
Time managment |
The presentation is fitted within 15– 20 minutes. The pace does not seem too rushed or too slow. |
The presentation is around 15–20 minutes, but the pace was a bit rushed or slow |
The presentation lasted less between 10 and 12 minutes or between 22 and 25 minutes. Or The pace was rushed or slow |
The presentation lasted less than 10 minutes or more than 25. Or The pace was rushed or slow |
Slides |
Information on slides reflects deep understanding and effective summarization. Information has not simply been copied and pasted from another source. Slides display elements of effective design. Fonts, colors, backgrounds, etc. are effective, consistent and appropriate to the topic and audience. |
Information on slides reflects understanding and good summarization. Information has not simply been copied and pasted from another source. Slides display elements of appropriate design. Fonts, colors, backgrounds, etc. are occasionally distracting. |
Summarization and Information on slides is adequate. Some displays have been copied from other source. Design is adequate. |
No or little understanding is reflected on the slides. There is too much text on the slides. Or not enough information. Or information has been copied and pasted from other sources. Design is not apropriate. |
Logic and organization |
The presentation has a clearly defined structure with elegant transitions and an effective introduction |
The presentation has a clearly defined structure with some clear transitions and a logical introduction and conclusion |
The presentation has a recognizable structure with an introduction and conclusion |
The presentation has no clearly defined structure, or the structure is chaotic |
Technical content |
Compelling, engaging content that covered the topic thoroughly, was interesting to class members, and taught them something. |
Content was pretty thorough but lacked in some areas; audience members benefited from the presentation; |
The content was weak in coverage but engaging at times, class members took away something interesting; |
The content was not stimulating to audience members; presented just in order to minimally satisfy the requirement; |